Disclaimer: The subject of this post is human sexuality in the context of Christian belief. It is intended for mature audiences. If you are under the age of 18 you should have your parents read it and judge if it is appropriate for you to read. Parents, lighten up about this with your teens because quite frankly I am trying to undo a lot of Christian mistakes in informing and educating people about sex. You have been warned and encouraged, enter at your own risk.
There are several things we are going to have to acknowledge in our world and one o them is that theology and biology have not gotten along very well in recent days but I think both have to be considered if we are going to deal with the real world of sex and marriage. I want to deal with the realities of both so that when we actually talk sexual issues later we will have a foundation to work from.
Biologically I feel that we are driven as a race to reproduce. Everything about a man and a woman from a sexual point of view is to drive a person to that end. If we were to look at it from a purely biological point of view reproduction is the driving force of sex and this is still true even in marriage at all times. The biology of sexual attraction, sexual desire and even sex itself play right into biological hands. The whole process is designed that men will couple with women and produce children. It however is a complicated one.
If we were to leave the sexes in the pure biological realm, men and women would have very different motivations for pursuing and engaging in sex. Men from a pure biological sense would want to spread the genetics around as much as possible in a competitive drive to propagate themselves. This would mean multiple partners and as much sex as possible. Biology put a man attracted to women on a purely visual grounds desiring the pleasure of sex to propagate himself genetically. It explains a man’s capabilities. A man is capable of having sex 3-6 times a day on average. He needs only to be aroused visually to be ready for sex and for the most part men are attracted to the curvy form of women by sight. His desire for sex is always in a stand by mode and can be triggered very easily.
Women by nature are far more conscious of the emotional nature of sex. Biologically there bodies desire sex so they can become pregnant. As much as a woman want to fight this sooner or later she is sexually aroused to this end. While women can be sexually aroused at any time the cycle of her menstrual period also produces sexual desire that is variable and it is higher at the times when she is most fertile. In a sense a woman’s body being ready to be impregnated can influence her desire for sex but it does not stop her from being aroused at other times. A woman is often said to need to be in the mood for sex but as many will tell you their mood can be aroused with kindness and affection.
Pleasure from sex itself is different for the sexes. A man can pretty much guarantee he will experience orgasm but that is not so true for women. Women however have an advantage over men in that it is far easier for them to experience multiple orgasms than men. It can affect desire in many ways. Women I think can experience more pleasure in sex than men but it is not always a guaranteed thing so they are far more selective about when, why and where. It is not that they don’t desire sex but there is definitely a higher desire to enjoy it. They want good sex not just any sex; where a man will take sex anyway it comes.
These are generalizations of course and there could be exceptions. However, a point can be made in biology on marriage or other long-term sexual relationships and that is biology will only carry you so far. In the end things can get boring very quickly for both sexes if we leave it purely to biology. Once a man gets a woman the conquest is over so he looks for a new one. Given the variable nature of a woman’s sexual desire and pleasure, what arouses her in the beginning might not work later. Biology ultimately leads us to a cold a mechanical process of procreation not intimacy. If this is all there is to it sex gets ordinary.
At the same time biology does constantly affect us even in marriage. It is why a man who is happily married can find himself sexually attracted to another woman. It is why a woman, who is bored with her sex life with her husband can feel aroused in the presence of a man who makes her feel desired and special and at times when she is more likely to get pregnant and her husband may not be around. What changes for the Christian is the introduction of a theology of sexuality that puts biology under theology.
For the Christian couple that wants a full and satisfying sex life, there are many challenges that biology provides. Most Christian couple want children and so pregnancy with all its sexual hurdles does come into play. Regardless of the constantly changing biology of his wife, a Christian husband’s drive and sexual desire remain the same. Pregnancy and a host of other reasons may mean that a woman may not desire of be able to have sex. As one commentator put it: “women simply have to acknowledge that there are times that we have to keep our legs together even if we don’t want to.” That same commentator uses this as her justification for her advice to married women to let their husbands cheat and unfortunately this is not an option for Christian couples who want to not only be faithful to each other but to God’s commands concerning sex. The Christian couple both man and woman can find themselves in many awkward situations because of biology.
For the Christian couple, biology needs to be acknowledged as a strong driving force and should be realistically dealt with but also the reality of pleasing God in all things including sex takes precedence. As much as the world may say: ‘You and me ain’t nothing but animals…”, the Christian couple has take a different path To them biology is in the equation of sexuality but it is more than that to them – it has a theology as well. For the Christian the biology is there but there is something higher in the nature of sex that they are striving to understand. God may have hard wired are desire to reproduce and the nature of our desire for sex as men and women biologically, but does not change the fact that He had spiritual expectations as well when it came to sex that should take precedence over that biology.
Next: Theology and the Nature of Sex
Great post and then it washed along with the mainstream views which are designed to blind people from the truth.
1.” Women by nature are far more conscious of the emotional nature of sex.”
Then how do we explain how women easily resort to prostitution? Even going as far as using sex as currency or payment for ‘things done’ in their marriages.. which is basically prostitution.
2. “Women however have an advantage over men in that it is far easier for them to experience multiple orgasms than men”
Most women will never and have never experienced multiple orgasm.
3. “Women I think can experience more pleasure in sex than men but it is not always a guaranteed thing so they are far more selective about when, why and where”
False, there is no way to measure who is experiencing more, its subjective anyway. Nor are they selective about why when and where, they too do it when they ‘feel’ like it.
4. “They want good sex not just any sex; where a man will take sex anyway it comes.”
Again mainstream view that men are just always ready to go, come on now, that not true.
5. ” Once a man gets a woman the conquest is over so he looks for a new one. ”
Oh really, then how do we explain men being faithful to their wives?
6. “Biology ultimately leads us to a cold a mechanical process of procreation not intimacy.”
Unlike animals we humans engage in sex independently of our biology. Animals engage in sex seasonally or when they are in ‘heat’. We humans just have sex because we ‘feel’ like it. Also if that was true how do explain the porn business? No intimacy and certainly no intent of procreation there.
5. ” A woman is often said to need to be in the mood for sex but as many will tell you their mood can be aroused with kindness and affection.”
Probably the biggest myth doing the rounds in the media, far from the truth.
6.”For the Christian couple, biology needs to be acknowledged as a strong driving force and should be realistically dealt with but also the reality of pleasing God in all things including sex takes precedence”
Sex for humans is not biological, the media wants us to believe that so that we may forget and its spiritual significance.
6. “women simply have to acknowledge that there are times that we have to keep our legs together even if we don’t want to.”
The Christian couple is not allowed to refuse sex to each other, except for prayer or when the women is on her cycle. The man may not deny his wife and the wife deny her husband. 1 Cor 7:3-5
“Sex for humans is not biological, the media wants us to believe that so that we may forget and ignore its spiritual significance.”
Excuse my ‘rant’, but if aim to give a Christian view on a topic like sex, one which the church is practically silent on then the least you can do is stay away from perpetuating these mainstream ideas which are literally driving people insane. Sex is a billion dollar industry and as such you can be guaranteed that it is filled with myth and lies.
I mean well, please take no offence.
if you aim
Ok, Rabyd Theologian takes deep breath. This is only part three of this series and I am engaged purely in the biological part at this point and have yet not gotten to the spiritual (part 4 is next week in this very thing) . My hope is to tear things apart a little and then put it back together. You are ranting at a partially done thing and I haven’t hit yet what you are talking about which will start in the next part. Most of what you are ranting about, I simply have not got to what you are talking about yet. Go back and read this whole series and also realize I am not finished. Get a grip, calm down and be patient I will get to the end and then you can rant if you think I am wrong. This post is not the whole story. It is part three of many to come.
I will say this the mainstream view is not completely based on lies. If it was it would not survive. The point is of this post was not to engage the whole subject of the Christian Marriage Bed. This is merely the beginning of a series which I do not know the length of yet. This post was purely the sexual capability and nature of the beast BASED PURELY ON BIOLOGY.
I am not own of those people that feels that biology has nothing to do with sex. It does because that is the way that God has designed us. I am not an either or person who thinks the world cannot discover truth from time to time. I look at mankind as a whole and that includes biology, spirituality and the rest. That includes our sexuality. We are not merely biological beings or spiritual being we are both and both affect us..
As I read your comment s your reading a lot into what I have said. I too do not believe the media on this either but my observations are not based on the media but the science of sexuality which have studied.
1. Did not say women could not look past their emotional sensitivity, just said they are emotionally more sensitive, I said nothing about whether they can look past or turn it off. I simply make not that this is a capacity they have, should the choose to use it.
2-3. Just because most women do not experience in sex multiple orgasm does not mean they are not capable of it. There is a difference between capacity and experience to be sure. I was speaking to capacity on both issues not experience, that is a later issue for a later post.
4-5. Faithfulness is a spiritual quality but this post was based purely biological issues. Same goes for promiscuity.
6. Once again I probably agree with you but you are jumping the gun here and I have not got to that.
The last two comments I will only say – not dealing with how Christianity changes things yet and I do not dismiss the notion that women and men respond to sexual desire and arousal differently because there is more than media opinion behind that – there is good science behind it.
Sex is both biological and spiritual. It is not one or another.
IMMHO.
I agree. This post just follows main stream thinking and is not in line with Biblical teaching.